سُورَةُ المَائـِدَةِ

Testimony of Two Just Witnesses for the Final Will and Testament This honorable Ayah contains a glorious ruling from Allah. Allah's statement, يِـأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ شَهَـدَةُ بَيْنِكُمْ إِذَا حَضَرَ أَحَدَكُمُ الْمَوْتُ حِينَ الْوَصِيَّةِ اثْنَانِ (O you who believe! When death approaches any of you, and you make a bequest, then take the testimony of two...) meaning that there should be two witnesses in such cases, ذَوَا عَدْلٍ (just men...) thus, describing them as just, مِّنكُمْ (of your own folk) Muslims. أَوْ ءَاخَرَانِ مِنْ غَيْرِكُمْ (or two others from outside) non-Muslims, meaning the People of the Book, according to Ibn `Abbas as Ibn Abi Hatim recorded. Allah said next, إِنْ أَنتُمْ ضَرَبْتُمْ فِى الاٌّرْضِ (if you are traveling through the land) on a journey, فَأَصَابَتْكُم مُّصِيبَةُ الْمَوْتِ (and the calamity of death befalls you.) These are two conditions that permit using non-Muslims from among the Dhimmis for witnesses when there are no Muslims present: When one is traveling and needs to write a will, as Sharih Al-Qadi said. Ibn Jarir recorded that Sharih said, "The witness of the Jews and Christians is not allowed except while traveling, and even then only to witness the dictation of the will." Allah's statement, تَحْبِسُونَهُمَا مِن بَعْدِ الصَّلوةِ (Detain them both after the Salah (the prayer),) refers to the `Asr prayer, according to Al-`Awfi who reported it from Ibn `Abbas. This is the same explanation reported from Sa`id bin Jubayr, Ibrahim An-Nakha`i, Qatadah, `Ikrimah and Muhammad bin Sirin. As for Az-Zuhri, he said that they are detained after Muslim prayer (i.e., in congregation). Therefore, these two witnesses will be detained after a congregational prayer, فَيُقْسِمَانِ بِاللَّهِ إِنِ ارْتَبْتُمْ (let them both swear by Allah if you are in doubt.) meaning, if you are in doubt that they might have committed treachery or theft, then they should swear by Allah, لاَ نَشْتَرِى بِهِ (We wish not in this) in our vows, according to Muqatil bin Hayyan, ثَمَناً (for any worldly gain) of this soon to end life, وَلَوْ كَانَ ذَا قُرْبَى (even though he be our near relative.) meaning, if the beneficiary be our near relative, we will still not compromise on the truth. وَلاَ نَكْتُمُ شَهَـدَةَ اللَّهِ (We shall not hide the testimony of Allah,) thus stating that the testimony is Allah's, as a way of respecting it and valuing its significance, إِنَّآ إِذَاً لَّمِنَ الاٌّثِمِينَ (for then indeed we should be of the sinful.) if we distort the testimony, change, alter or hide it entirely. Allah said next, فَإِنْ عُثِرَ عَلَى أَنَّهُمَا اسْتَحَقَّآ إِثْماً (If it then becomes known that these two had been guilty of sin...) if the two witnesses were found to have cheated or stolen from the money that the will is being written about, يِقُومَانُ مَقَامَهُمَا مِنَ الَّذِينَ اسْتَحَقَّ عَلَيْهِمُ الاٌّوْلَيَانِ (let two others stand forth in their places, nearest in kin from among those who claim a lawful right.) This Ayah indicates that if the two witnesses were found to have committed treachery, then two of the nearest rightful inheritors should stand for witness in their place, فَيُقْسِمَانِ بِاللَّهِ لَشَهَـدَتُنَا أَحَقُّ مِن شَهَـدَتِهِمَا (Let them swear by Allah (saying): "We affirm that our testimony is truer than that of both of them...") Meaning, our testimony that they have cheated is more truthful than the testimony that they have offered, وَمَا اعْتَدَيْنَآ (and that we have not trespassed (the truth),) when we accused them of treachery, إِنَّا إِذاً لَّمِنَ الظَّـلِمِينَ (for then indeed we should be of the wrongdoers.) if we had lied about them. This is the oath of the heirs, and preference is to be given to their saying. Just as in the case with the oath of relative of a murdered person if he attempts to tarnish the case of the murdered person. So his family takes an oath in defense of his honor. This is discussed in the studies of the oaths in the books of Ahkam. Allah's statement, ذلِكَ أَدْنَى أَن يَأْتُواْ بِالشَّهَـدَةِ عَلَى وَجْهِهَآ (That should make it closer (to the fact) that their testimony would be in its true nature and shape (and thus accepted),) means, the ruling requiring the two Dhimmi witnesses to swear, if there is a doubt that they were not truthful, might compel them to admit to the testimony in its true form. Allah's statement, أَوْ يَخَـفُواْ أَن تُرَدَّ أَيْمَـنٌ بَعْدَ أَيْمَـنِهِمْ (or else they would fear that (other) oaths would be admitted after their oaths.) means, requiring them to swear by Allah might encourage them to admit to the true testimony because they respect swearing by Allah and they glorify and revere Him. They also fear exposure if the heirs of the deceased are required to swear instead of them. In this case, the heirs would swear and earn the rightful inheritance that the two witnesses failed to declare. This is why Allah said, أَوْ يَخَـفُواْ أَن تُرَدَّ أَيْمَـنٌ بَعْدَ أَيْمَـنِهِمْ (or else they would fear that (other) oaths would be admitted after their oaths.), then, وَاتَّقُواْ اللَّهَ (And have Taqwa of Allah) in all of your affairs, وَاسْمَعُواْ (and listen.) and obey, وَاللَّهُ لاَ يَهْدِى الْقَوْمَ الْفَـسِقِينَ (And Allah guides not the rebellious people.) who do not obey Him or follow His Law. يَوْمَ يَجْمَعُ اللَّهُ الرُّسُلَ فَيَقُولُ مَاذَآ أُجِبْتُمْ قَالُواْ لاَ عِلْمَ لَنَآ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ عَلَّـمُ الْغُيُوبِ

ذلك الحكم عند الارتياب في الشاهدين من الحلف بعد الصلاة وعدم قبول شهادتهما، أقرب إلى أن يأتوا بالشهادة على حقيقتها خوفًا من عذاب الآخرة، أو خشية من أن ترد اليمين الكاذبة من قِبَل أصحاب الحق بعد حلفهم، فيفتضح الكاذب الذي ردت يمينه في الدنيا وقت ظهور خيانته. وخافوا الله -أيها الناس- وراقبوه أن تحلفوا كذبًا، وأن تقتطعوا بأيمانكم مالا حرامًا، واسمعوا ما توعظون به. والله لا يهدي القوم الفاسقين الخارجين عن طاعته.